Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 13(1): 61-66, ene. 2011. tab, ilus
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-124393

RESUMO

AIM: Advanced pancreatic cancer has a bad prognosis, with a median overall survival (OS) no longer than 4-6 months. Since the end of last century, monotherapy with gemcitabine has remained the elective therapy, but new schedules are needed in order to improve these results. We aim to evaluate the efficacy of tegafur and levofolinic acid (LV) associated with gemcitabine, as well as its toxicity, progression-free survival and OS in advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An open-label, multicentric, prospective, non-controlled trial was carried out on patients with advanced or disseminated pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine 1250 mg/m² was administered on the 1st and 8th days of the cycle, tegafur 750 mg/m²/day for 21 consecutive days and LV 25 mg/day continuously, every 28 days, with a maximum of six cycles. The primary variable was tumour overall response rate (ORR). Secondarily, time to progression (TTP), OS and scheme toxicity were determined. RESULTS: Forty patients were recruited; the male/female ratio was 30:10, with a mean age of 61 years. Forty percent had a Karnofsky index of 90% or 100%. Only 11 patients (27%) completed the six cycles of treatment, but more than 50% received three or more cycles. Dose intensity was 89.56% for gemcitabine and 87.36% for tegafur. Efficacy ORR was 22.5% (CI 95%, 6-37%). TTP was 3.87 months (CI 95%, 2.1-5.6), time to treatment failure was 2.97 months (CI 95%, 2.43-4.67) and OS 6.3 months (CI 95%, 4-7). The chemotherapeutic combination was well accepted; most haematologic and non-haematologic toxicities were grade 1 or 2. The most prevalent grade 3/4 toxicities were asthenia (30%), liver biochemistry disorders (25%), diarrhoea (15%) and stomatitis (12%). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of gemcitabine, associated with oral tegafur and leucovorin, has activity against advanced pancreatic cancer, with an adequate toxicity profile (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Tegafur/administração & dosagem , Tegafur/efeitos adversos , Leucovorina/administração & dosagem , Leucovorina/efeitos adversos , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Administração Oral , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Análise de Sobrevida
2.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 12(5): 381-383, mayo 2010. tab
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-124085

RESUMO

Haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) is a rare thromboembolic complication observed in patients with cancer. It is characterised by the clinical triad of acute renal failure, microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia and thrombocytopaenia. It may be associated with a variety of aetiologies, including chemotherapeutic agents such as mitomycin, cisplatin, bleomycin, 5-fluorouracil and, most recently, gemcitabine. We report a 70-year-old patient treated with gemcitabine who developed haemolytic uraemic syndrome (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Síndrome Hemolítico-Urêmica/induzido quimicamente , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carboplatina/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma/patologia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Urotélio , Urotélio/patologia , Desoxicitidina/efeitos adversos
4.
Lung Cancer ; 28(2): 109-15, 2000 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10717328

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This phase II trial was designed to assess the efficacy and toxicity profile of the combination of gemcitabine, ifosfamide and cisplatin (GIP) in the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients included in the study were those with surgically unresectable or metastatic NSCLC, with bidimensionally measurable disease, a Karnofsky performance status > 60, and who had not received previous chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of 1000 mg/m(2) gemcitabine on days 1 and 8, 3 g/m(2) ifosfamide on day 1, and 50 mg/m(2) cisplatin on day 1, administered in 21-day cycles. A maximum of six cycles were administered. RESULTS: Between March 1996 and December 1997, 60 patients were included in the study (37 stage III and 23 stage IV), of which 59 were evaluated for response. An objective response was obtained in 43% of patients (3% complete and 40% partial responses), whereas 22% had stable disease. The median survival time for the whole group was 52 weeks (65 weeks in patients with stage III, and 35 weeks in stage IV). The most frequent toxicity was haematological, 56% of patients presented grade 3 or 4 myelotoxicity in one of the cycles, although only seven episodes of febrile neutropenia were recorded in the 255 cycles administered. CONCLUSIONS: The GIP regimen attains response rates similar to those obtained with the gemcitabine plus cisplatin combination used in advanced NSCLC, and had an acceptable toxicity profile.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Ifosfamida/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Rev Enferm ; 21(233): 18-20, 1998 Jan.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9580320

RESUMO

Karnofsky's scale is one of the indexes most frequently used to measure cancer patients' quality of life. The main problem encountered when trying to verify it is the degree of subjectivity inherent in it. Due to this, an attempt was made to create a more objective measuring instrument based on Karnofsky's scale. To this end, a retrospective study involving 300 outpatients was carried out. For these patients, their Karnofsky index was determined by two independent agents: the patient's oncologist and the nursing team which complied its measure based on a survey answered by the patient himself/herself. The differences between these two methods proved to be statistically insignificant.


Assuntos
Avaliação de Estado de Karnofsky , Neoplasias/psicologia , Avaliação em Enfermagem/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Idoso , Algoritmos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Oncologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Pesquisa em Avaliação de Enfermagem , Enfermagem Oncológica , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...